You are here: Home > Reviews > First Class Flyer > VirtualBox 3.1.2 vs VMware Player 3.0 (First Class Flyer)

VirtualBox 3.1.2 vs VMware Player 3.0 (First Class Flyer)

Do you want to run multiple operating systems without going through multi-booting? The most popular way to do this would be virtualization. I previously compared the free VirtualBox against the premium VMware Workstation. But VMware also offers a free version of their virtualization product, known as VMware Player. How would these two free products compare to each other?

VMware Player

VMware Player

Welcome to First Class Flyer!

Tech Airlines introduces our First Class Flyer series, being published every Friday with two or more products being compared in multiple categories. Which product is flying first class today? Today, it’s between VirtualBox and VMware Player.

Important Notes:
The results in this test are relative to my own Windows 7 Ultimate system with a 2 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 Processor with 3 GB of Physical RAM. Results for different system configurations may vary.

Guest OS System Specifications:
Windows XP Professional: 512 MB RAM and 20 GB Virtual Hard Disk
Windows Vista Ultimate: 2048 MB RAM and 40 GB Virtual Hard Disk

All time measurements (besides installation time) are made after the respective ‘Guest Additions’ which improve performance and add useful features are installed.

VMware and VirtualBox Download Sizes

Download Sizes of VMware Player and VirtualBox downloaded from virtualbox.org and vmware.com

Download Size

The main VirtualBox for Windows download weighs in around 71.5 MB compared to the VMware Player for Windows download which is around 89.9 MB.

It is also good to note that the VMware Player download does not include VMware Tools, which is separate download as an “update”. VirtualBox already has the guest additions/tools with the download.

If you’re downloading from the VMware site, registration is required which includes providing a lot of information, including a phone number. For those who do not wish to register, download if from sites like Softpedia instead.

VirtualBox: 4.5
VMware: 3

VMware Tools Download

VMware Tools is a separate download as an 'update'.

Installation Size

The final installation of VMware was 488 MB indicating very high compression was used for the download (89.9 MB). On the other hand, the VirtualBox installation is only 85.8 MB, which isn’t that much larger than the download (71.5 MB).

VirtualBox: 4 (8.5 total)
VMware: 4 (7 total)

Guest Installation Speed

VMware offers a special feature known as “Easy Install”, which handles all user interaction for the user so they can just click Start and sit back, grab a coffee, and watch everything be installed with absolutely no user interaction, including the product key, username, and password, which can be entered in during VM setup.

Easy Install Notice

VMware detects what operating system is being installed and offers to use Easy Install

For the purpose of this test, I selected “I will install the operating system later” to avoid using Easy Install.

Easy Install Vista

When Easy Install is being used, a notice shows at the bottom.

I started the stopwatch when everything that requires user interaction is done and automated installation starts.

XP VirtualBox

Windows XP Professional installing on VirtualBox

Vista VMware

Windows Vista Ultimate installing on VMware Player

So how long did each take to install? I expected VMware Player to be faster since its based on the VMware Workstation engine which I had tested last time to be faster. However, my results this time told a different story.

Guest Installation

Guest OS Installation Comparison

VirtualBox installed the operating systems about one minute faster than VMware Player did.

VirtualBox: 5 (13.5 total)
VMware: 4 (11 total)

Guest Startup Times

Startup speed is always very important. Nobody likes to wait very long for a computer to start. The stopwatch started once the BIOS splash screen fades away and stopped when the login screen came up on XP and the Vista Orb on Vista.

Guest Startup Comparison

Guest Startup Comparison

The average startup time for the two guest systems was 38.5 seconds on VirtualBox and 40.5 seconds on VMware Player.

VirtualBox: 5 (18.5 total)
VMware: 4.7 (15.7 total)

Guest Shutdown Times

Like startup times, who wants to wait forever to shutdown their computer? I certainly don’t. The stopwatch was started once it finished logging off and stopped once it fully shut down and the guest window closes or returns to the home screen.

Shutdown Time Comparison

Shutdown Time Comparison

VirtualBox was slightly faster for both operating systems with an average of 16.5 seconds compared to 19 seconds. Every second counts when it comes to startup and shutdown.

VirtualBox: 5 (23.5 total)
VMware: 4.7 (20.4 total)

700 MB Ubuntu ISO Transfer from Desktop to Flash Drive

Both programs support USB Devices. Simply click on the USB Device icon in the status bar of VirtualBox or VMware and select the respective device. It will then disconnect from the host and attach to the guest. Additional drivers will be installed as needed.

I used an 8 GB Sandisk Cruzer Flash Drive and transferred ~700 MB Ubuntu 9.10 ISO file from the guest Desktop to the flash drive.

Flash Drive Transfer Comparison

Flash Drive Transfer Comparison

VirtualBox was slightly slower at transfer speed with an average of 343.5 seconds compared to 309.5 seconds.

VirtualBox: 4 (27.5 total)
VMware: 5 (25.4 total)

700 MB Ubuntu ISO Transfer From Desktop to C:\ Root

I transferred the same 700 MB ISO file used above from the desktop to the root of the hard disk.

Disk Transfer Comparison

Disk Transfer Comparison

VirtualBox had a faster average of 63 seconds compared to VMware’s average of 71.5 seconds.

VirtualBox: 5 (32.5 total)
VMware: 4.3 (29.7 total)

Special Feature: Unity/Seamless Mode

Both VirtualBox and VMware let you run the operating system without the program’s window so each of the guest windows are integrated into the host system. VirtualBox calls this Seamless Mode and VMware calls it Unity.

With VirtualBox, its basically hiding the desktop background and placing the guest taskbar on the host desktop.

In addition, there are strange issues with Seamless and Windows Desktop Gadgets, with part of the guest desktop background showing as a border to gadgets. In addition, there is often a lagging trail of the guest desktop background when moving seamless windows.

VirtualBox Seamless

VirtualBox Seamless Mode. Notice the guest windows are taken as one window by Windows 7

VMware takes it further and rather than just hide the desktop, it hides the taskbar too and attempts to integrate guest applications into the host taskbar, which is similar to what Windows XP Mode does.

XP Unity Mode

Windows XP in Unity Mode

Windows Vista in Unity Mode was a bit strange since I had Windows Aero enabled on it. Rather than having the Aero be translucent to my host desktop background, it used a plain dark blue background to place behind the Aero instead creating a strange effect.

Vista Unity Mode

Windows Vista in Unity Mode with Aero enabled

VMware takes the crown for this round providing a more seamless virtualized experience than VirtualBox offers.

VirtualBox: 4 (36.5 total)
VMware: 4.5 (34.2 total)

Shared Folders and Transferring Files Between Guest and Host

Both VMware and VirtualBox offer shared folders between the guest and host and both are quite confusing to implement without digging into the long user manuals. VirtualBox at least mentions it when users hover over the folders list in settings, though there isn’t a very detailed explanation. Replace “sharename” with the name you gave the folder during the shared folders setup.

VirtualBox:

Windows-Map Network Drive:

\\vboxsvr\sharename

Linux-Terminal Commands:

sudo mkdir sharename
sudo mount.vboxsf sharename ~/sharename

VMware:

Windows-Location:

My Network Places\VMware Shared Folders\.host\Shared Folders\sharename

Windows-Map Network Drive:

\\.host\Shared Folders\sharename

Linux-Location:

~/mnt/hgfs

But with VMware, if you just need to transfer files, its even easier. Just drag and drop! The files can be copied to and from the guest system. In addition, the virtual hard disk files (.vmdk) can be mapped on Windows and be used as an actual hard drive. This isn’t possible with VirtualBox disks.

VirtualBox: 4 (40.5 total)
VMware: 5 (39.2 total)

VMware disks (.vmdk) are compatible with VirtualBox, although VirtualBox disks (.vdi) are not compatible with VMware.

The score so far is 40.5 points for VirtualBox and 39.2 for VMware Player. It’s very close. So it looks like it’s time for…

Bonus Points!

Windows Aero Support

VMware fully supports Windows Display Driver Model and therefore supports the Windows Aero interface given that the guest is provided enough RAM and the host supports Aero.

VMware Aero

The latest version of VMware Player fully supports Windows Aero

VMware: 2 bonus points (41.2 total)

Snapshot Support and Management

The free VMware Player does not support Snapshots beyond the state saving and suspension. VirtualBox however provides full snapshot support. While it is not as powerful as VMware Workstation, it is still a very useful feature similar to Windows Restore Points, only better and quicker.

VirtualBox: 4 bonus points (44.5 total)

Easy Install

As mentioned earlier, Easy Install lets user sit back and watch all the work be done for them during OS installation. A feature that many will definitely love.

VMware: 3 bonus points (44.2 total)

So what’s the final scores?

VirtualBox: 44.5 points
VMware: 44.2 points

Extremely close, but the winner is… Sun VirtualBox!

Sun VirtualBox
Supports Windows, Mac, and Linux

VMware Player (No Registration Required Download from Softpedia)
Supports Windows and Linux

And… that completes this first edition of First Class Flyer. Join us next Friday for our next First Class Flyer!

Namecheap.com - Cheap domain name registration, renewal and transfers - Free SSL Certificates - Web Hosting

Tags: , , , , , , ,

10 Responses to " VirtualBox 3.1.2 vs VMware Player 3.0 (First Class Flyer) "

  1. Creastery says:

    Wow! First class flyer, eh?
    Nice comparism by the way. Impressed =D

  2. Master Gobada says:

    “First class flyer”. Interesting. It’s ironic how First Class is more expensive than normal though. }:)

    I find it hilarious how in nearly every category, XP is faster than Vista. Meh.

    • Brian says:

      Hi Master Gobada. Compare the sizes of XP and Vista. The installation disk of XP is around 600 MB compared to Vista/7 which is almost 3 GB.

      Vista has a lot more eye candy than XP which significantly slows down the operating system. The system requirements of Vista was significantly higher than XP, which triggered lots of negative criticism because many were not ready for the big change.

      Also, keep in mind that I only have 3 GB of RAM on the computer I used to test VMware and VirtualBox, and Vista requires 2 GB or more to run smoothly. Compare that to XP which runs perfectly with 512 MB.

  3. Paul says:

    I have tried both Virtualbox and VMWare Player and ended up a little frustrated with both. But I intend to persevere and I found your article very useful. Thanks.

    I would prefer to use VMWare Player but its one vital shortfall is that it will not keep snapshots. Having created a VM and installed an OS, eg. Win XP, SP2, SP3 and latest updates, the last thing you need is to reinstall the whole lot because you cannot restore from a snapshot. VMs are great for experimenting when you can just wipe a failure and restore to an earlier state, but not with VMWare Player.

    • Brian says:

      Paul,

      Yep, snapshots are the primary thing that is preventing me from using VMware Player. I do a lot of experimenting inside virtual machines and I need to be able to easily backup and restore everything.

      Thanks for visiting,
      Brian

  4. Daniele says:

    What about USB-Bluetooth dongle?
    I’m trying under Virtualbox with no result :(
    Everything OK with VMware Player 3…

  5. Jim says:

    I run Virtual PC2007 with an XP Pro VM, virtualbox with Kubunto 9.04 VM, and VMplayer running an XBUNTU 9.1. PC2007 hosts Microsft products very reliably, and nothing else well. For hosting XP on Vista, it was easily best. When comparing Virtualbox to VMware using Vista as host and UBUNTU flavors as VM, its not even a competition… And creating a good working image with VMplayer is sooooo turn-key. Def not the case with Virtualbox with the 5 suselinux and ubuntu linux distros I tried. VMware just seems to do everything better. As far as not being able to Export Images you made with VMplayer, its actually really easy… Maybe theye didn’t intend for it to be simple, but it really is. Anyway for me, using a LINUX VM on a Microsoft host, VMplayer wins. (Jim)

    Also, virtual pc2007 and VMware coexist very well. No conflicts at all when both are running…. For me….

  6. Lynze Mac says:

    Good comparision. Thanks!!
    Lynze Mac´s last blog ..enMACado Podcast 01×04 My ComLuv Profile

  7. Joe Alvarez says:

    Thanks for the thorough comparison! VMWare provides a free utility to convert physical machines or virtual machines to the VMWare format. VMware vCenter Converter painlessly moved my VirtalBox Win XP Pro to VMWare format that works with free VMWare Player. VirtualBox has been really great, but VMWare is definitely the main player in the VMWare world and I imagine will be around longer.

    • Brian says:

      Joe,

      I currently have both installed but tend to use VMware Player more often because I love the drag and drop file transfers between the host and the guest. It’s just much easier than going through shared folders. The Easy Install feature is nice to have too.

      I use VirtualBox for testing of large things as the snapshots feature is very useful and VMware Player doesn’t seem to offer that.

      Thanks for visiting and commenting!

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Have a question about commenting? Check the Commenting FAQ.

Copyright © 2009-2010 TechAirlines. All Rights Reserved.